AIMA Tacit Approval

Do you have the reference to the actual law for us to fully “admire” the changes?

No, i did not retain my research and it was uneventful anyway. Something to the effect of “provision X of Lei Y is hereby repealed.”

1 Like

Generally speaking, this is because murder is wrong.

And if people can’t work to eat and the choice is to starve or to steal, they will steal.

The changes are not yet posted in the diario, but you’ll find them here eventually.

https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/legislacao-consolidada/lei/2007-67564445

1 Like

I would not call it “murder”. If they could come over by boat repeatedly, they surely know how to go back home also by boat.

And if “steal” is not punished and instead of of being punish, steal is being rewarded with a higher prize than work, then obviously one must steal…:sweat_smile:

Migrants that arrive by boat often barely make it. There’s a reason you hear about boats sinking in the med all the time.

These are some of the most desperate people on the planet, or they would not be making this sort of journey. Imagine life in their shoes

This is off topic so that’s the last I’ll say

This is the old law

Artigo 82.º

7 - Na falta de decisão no prazo previsto no número anterior, por causa não imputável ao requerente, o pedido entende-se como deferido, sendo a emissão do título de residência imediata.

And in the text of the new law https://www.parlamento.pt/ActividadeParlamentar/Paginas/DetalheDiplomaAprovado.aspx?BID=135866

Artigo 82.º

7 - (Revogado.)

2 Likes

Lovely! Now they can take there sweet time… oh wait, they have already mastered the art of doing nothing!..