The politics of immigration to Portugal

You’d be better off not using Uber Eats or Glovo and voting with your wallet since as I understand, you are not a citizen and don’t have any other means to vote. Posting disrespectful commentary about the people that serve you everyday on an online forum won’t get you the results you probably want.

Also, since people seem to be missing this information lately just posting it again here as a PSA. No accusations towards anyone but a general reminder: Racism against brown people is also racism.

You keep fixating on tone because you can’t refute the substance.

Calling out a broken system makes me the villain, while you ignore the exploitation, the death of culture, and the fact that none of this actually serves Portugal.

Appreciate the PSA. Next time try forming an actual argument.

2 Likes

One can have a discussion about policy without resorting to painting all Uber eats drivers as porn watching unintegrating undesirables.

I won’t enter any argument here. The level of discourse is beneath the standard that warrants a response.

What’s the point of me arguing with a racist bot anyway? If you were a smart bot you’d know that I already agree with the problem but not with your racist tirades.

1 Like

You have a gift for writing !..

5 Likes

I think I have a possible explanation to this phenomenon. It’s probably coming from the fact there are generally two kinds of people - one mostly positive and generous, the other mostly negative and jealous. There are other terms used like abundance mentality vs. scarcity mentality, but you get the idea.

So the jealous people, they do still like ‘culture, safety, identity, social trust’, and they still would love to join it, but at the same time they are extremely jealous and want to destroy it. And when finally they succeed with flattening the landscape then they feel that evil satisfaction that now at last they are somehow ‘equal in moral poverty’, with nothing more to be jealous of.

Hence we observe sometimes what may seem at first a paradoxical behaviour, like immigrants come from an ‘inferior’ place wanting a better life for themselves (e.g. Americans emigrating to Portugal), but by being unfortunately ‘mentally scarce’ they immediately set on the course of imposing their own imported (but inferior by the above definition) moral code, behaviours, cultural approach etc., and destroying the very society they were so eager to become part of in the first place, purely out of extreme jealousy.

2 Likes

Care to share how much taxes you’ve paid to Portugal over the past three years? None of the “I spend money and I pay VAT, so I contribute to the economy” multiplier-effect song and dance. Also exclude whatever you pay to US IRS. How much is your tax bill to Portugal?

Do your kids go to public schools? Has anyone in your family used SNS?

If your kids already speak Portuguese, then my guess is you’ve been living in Portugal long enough to be grandfathered for NHR1.x. Then you are not paying much in taxes.

If you are a net beneficiary rather than a net contributor (nothing wrong with it—plenty of people here take advantage of NHR1.x), then do you count your “cultural warrior” activities on the internet as your contribution to Portugal? Or you count your whiteness as your contribution (as in, the Portuguese have the good fortune to “replenish” their own emigrated children with your white American kids, as opposed to kids of non-white immigrants)?

I’m not triggered. What makes a country attractive to an immigrant is completely subjective to that immigrant. And like I said before, a sovereign country has the perfect right to value homogeneity, even when its population is aging and declining (e.g. Japan).

What I’m saying is that my hypothetical Angolan friend is a more desirable immigrant than you. The hypothetical Indian Uber driver, if he pays more net contribution to Portugal (taxes paid, minus public services used), might also be a more desirable immigrant than you. Perhaps the Portuguese around you are just polite in front of you, and YOU are the reason they go home and vote Chega, and want non-CPLP immigrants to wait for 10 years to naturalise. Angolans only need to wait for 7 years.

1 Like

If you’d reference my big post of xenophobic propaganda above, this is a very common repeated trope that isn’t true. I can link more examples of this thought through history if you’d like. For example, this one is accusing immigrants of electoral fraud and saying they will ruin tht country if allowed to vote. The linked page as a whole is a good civics lesson about nativism and xenophobia

2 Likes

You seem hung up on the word ‘diluting’. Apparently it is proprietary to Aryan Nazi’s and no one can use it in a sentence again. Pick another word then that doesn’t offend your sensibilities that refers to a country and culture that is slowly losing what makes it special. Again, I agree that some immigrants integrate, however some don’t. What percentage that is can only be a wild guess. I don’t know where you get your news, but the average German now regrets Merkel’s policy of opening the doors to anyone. But I’ll give it to you. You’re throwing all the right words around. ‘Dog whistle’ ??? C’mon.

1 Like

I am directly discussing your ideas and use the Nazi comparisons to show how the exact same ideas were used. That you use the same words they did, is just another reason you should reconsider the things you say, not the foundation of my argument

Again, I agree that some immigrants integrate, however some don’t

“Again” despite this being the first time you’ve said some immigrants integrate

What percentage that is can only be a wild guess

No, we have data, which I’ve linked and you’ve ignored. I’ll copy paste it in case you’re unable to click my links

Religion

First of all, any projections like that vastly underestimate intergenerational attrition of religious affiliation and simply assume that all immigrants from Muslim-majority countries and their descendants are Muslim and are going to remain Muslim. However, in the particular case of France, such an assumption doesn’t even remotely reflect reality. For example, North Africa is the most common region of origin for French Muslims. However, only 64% of the descendants of immigrants from Algeria and 65% of descendants of immigrants from Morocco and Tunisia currently identify as Muslim (INSEE, 2023b, Figure 2). Moreover, the survey also found that religiosity declines over time even among those who remain Muslim (INSEE, 2023b, Figure 4).

Birth rates

However, claims about persistent significant differences in fertility rates between residents with roots in Muslim-majority countries and other residents of France has been proven to be false. For example, while fertility rates are somewhat higher among immigrants from North African countries, these rates for daughters of North African migrants fully converge with those of French women without an immigrant background (INSEE, 2023c).

Residential segregation

French Census data demonstrate a lack of isolation among resident foreigners coming from Muslim-majority countries. For example, an average Tunisian in France resides in neighborhoods that, on average, include 2.3% Tunisian co-residents. Similarly, for Algerians, this share is 5.0%; for Moroccans, it’s 5.1%; and for Turks, 3.7% (Pan Ke Shon and Verdugo, 2015). These numbers hardly indicate total social exclusion or ethnic ghettoization.

Intermarriage

Moreover, immigrants and descendants of immigrants from Muslim-majority countries are not just living in the same neighborhoods as people of other origins; they are living in the same households. The share of interethnic marriages among children of Maghrebi immigrants in France has increased from less than a quarter in 1992 (Tribalat, 1995; Lucassen and Laarman, 2009) to 57% in 2020 (INSEE, 2022). Crucially, we are not only seeing a gradually rising prevalence of interethnic marriage as immigrants from Muslim-majority countries and their descendants are gradually integrating into the host societies, but we are observing accelerated integration, as current children of immigrants (second-generation immigrants) demonstrate significantly higher exogamy rates than second-generation immigrants from the same countries several decades ago. Interestingly, such an acceleration of assimilation and integration of immigrants and their descendants is not unique to France and is actually quite common (as I am going to describe in one of my future posts).

Interethnic and interfaith marriages are now normal in France, and opposition to them is quite low among both Muslim and non-Muslim residents. In 2023, 70% of French residents are totally comfortable (Eurobarometer, 2023) with a love relationship of their child (or potential child) with a person of Muslim faith (including almost 85% among people younger than 35). For comparison, in 2015, the percentage of those totally comfortable stood at 62%, and only 53% among those born before 1960 (Eurobarometer, 2015).

Similarly, the same Eurobarometer surveys from 2019 and 2023 indicate that 71% of French Muslims are totally comfortable with the love relationship of their child with a Christian partner (while only 14% are uncomfortable).

Language

only 6% of adult children of immigrants from North Africa declare that they are able to read, speak, write, and understand the language of their parents very well (INSEE, 2023a). These numbers are somewhat higher when it comes to the ability to at least speak and understand the ancestral language very well (34% for descendants of immigrants from Algeria and 39% for those from Morocco and Tunisia). Crucially, 95% of adult second-generation immigrants from Algeria and 92% from Tunisia and Morocco declare that their parents used French when speaking to them during their childhood (INSEE, 2023a). Moreover, close to 40% of adult descendants of immigrants from those origins communicated with their parents exclusively in French (as their parents never used Arabic or Berber when speaking to them).

Gay rights

Eurobarometer surveys from 2019 to 2023 demonstrate that only 33% of French Muslims oppose gay marriage (Eurobarometer, 2019; Eurobarometer, 2023). Other recent surveys follow the same pattern. European Social Surveys from 2016 to 2020 also show high and rising support for gay rights among French Muslims. Only 44% among them oppose adoption by gay and lesbian couples. Importantly, the opposition declines to 31% among Muslims born in France (ESS Data Portal, 2023).

As you can see, the majority integrate. In what way do you think immigrants don’t integrate?

Thank you for proving my point. You just confirmed everything I said at the start.
I said some people treat nations like spreadsheets and you replied by auditing my tax returns lol

I’m talking about roots, memory, continuity
 basically why Portugal still feels like Portugal. You responded with an Excel file.

I love Portugal. You audit it. I think the difference speaks for itself.

4 Likes

@tkrunning might be time to shut this thread down


3 Likes

I love Portugal. I audit YOU and don’t find you a desirable immigrant, the same way you feel free to judge other immigrants.

Your presence in Portugal makes it a poorer and less kind place. The same way you joined this forum yesterday, and have brought us nothing but the quarrels in this thread.

1 Like

So the nazis were the bad guys, right? Bud, you’re not changing anyone’s mind over a forum. I grew up in South Africa and my friends were of all colours and creeds. Pretty sure I’m not racist. To call someone a racist over the internet when you know nothing about them but disagree with them tells me all I need to know. I wish you all the best sir.

1 Like

You made specific claims about what immigrants are doing, and specifically those arguments were the same as bigots have used over the years, even using some of the same phrasing exactly

I very clearly replied to your concerns and am not simply tossing insults but you still say that’s what I’m doing

If you don’t see how that’s not engaging in good faith discussion, then what’s the point

Following this thread, it does not cease to amaze me how excessively naive some fully formed human adults can be.
It’s a shame some of the folks from here were not around before the dreaded nazis came to power. Clearly it would have been enough to just shame them publicly, call them bigots, r-word, n-word and they would just crawl under the rock somewhere and cry their eyes out, instead of taking over Europe.
And what’s funny, these “kindergarten moralists” are unable to even remotely realize that their approach and behaviour is exactly what fuels parties like Chega now, probably even more so than the immigration influx itself!

3 Likes

Do you have an actual argument to make or are you just going to vaguely subtweet people?

I’ve provided a mountain of evidence that these xenophobic tropes are extremely common, and that the integration fears are not based on any evidence we have.

What is your specific complaint about immigration that hasn’t already been addressed?

Because if you, like Portugal Traveler, don’t have an argument other than anecdotes, your argument is unfalsifiable and you may as well stop posting because you won’t accept any amount of actual data or study.

I don’t know what you want me to be convinced with on the basis of ‘data’.

1 Like

Yep, this topic has definitely run its course :lock::lock::lock:

4 Likes