It might be hallucination. Ask for links and verify for yourself. Or post the links here so we can check them.
This is the link:
https://www.parlamento.pt/ActividadeParlamentar/Paginas/DetalheIniciativa.aspx?BID=315160
I think it is hallucinating. What I am shocked is the accuracy of this hallucination. Lol
The Decreto n.º 17/XVII your GPT cites (or even Decreto n.º 18/XVII) are from January, right? Or maybe even what got partially shot-down by the TC last year? So they don’t include the past 3 months of haggling?
I thought ChatGPT was bad but Gemini seems to have gotten worse. I checked Claude and it only says that something has been submitted but cannot find the exact text. This is consistent with the news above from Espresso.
(I think Gemini looked at the news and then force hallucinated on the substitute text).
Sorry guys for the false alarm.
Ah André, you blow like the wind. Last week you said the Socialists were irrelevant. This week you said the Socialists are keeping the government in check?
26-March:
Ventura announces that PSD and Chega are “very close” to an agreement on the Nationality Law
“There are bills in progress that everyone knows about, it’s no secret, that are being negotiated between the Government and Chega,” stated André Ventura, adding that “the Nationality Law is clearly not being negotiated with the Socialist Party, it’s being negotiated with Chega,”30-March:
“No agreement” on nationality: Chega accuses PSD of being no less socialist than PS
The president of Chega expressed “particular sadness” after the party became “fully involved in negotiations to ensure it was possible to circumvent the veto”… “The Government and the PSD, as always, are trying to stay in the good graces of the Socialist Party…”
From a lawyer on the WhatsApp group: the proposals will be published soon.
It is expected that PSD’s proposal will minimally fix the law to remove the unconstitutional parts. PS’s proposal will likely include some grandfathering.
On Apr 1 they will vote on which proposals to include in the final law and the law is likely to be passed by parliament that same day unless there is a consensual agreement to postpone the vote again.
But if Chega is not supportive and assuming PS’s proposals are ignored, will they have the vote to pass it?
Thanks for this update. This is different than we have been hearing from other attorneys previously. They have said April 1st is scheduled for a debate on the bill’s principles but not a final vote.
I’m curious about those who might be interested in apply for citizenship early: would it be necessary to submit the application tomorrow (March 31) if a final vote is actually happening on April 1?
It takes at least few weeks between parliament passing it before it comes into effect. First has to be promulgated by the president etc
I stopped reading that when I read that the President is Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa
The inaccurate LLM stuff is really counterproductive, and I’d love it if people would just stop. AI translations are fine, but an awful lot of confusion is coming from stuff that is made up or speculative and presented as fact or real analysis.
please stop posting slop, just post translations only.
So we should have some update in the next few days about a draft, am I understanding this right?
LLMs are fantastic at confidently lying, and I personally would be very happy to see copy-paste jobs like that banned from this site. They really diminish the value of these threads.
Hi all, sorry about posting something with the incorrect president. Obviously I was just trying to be helpful. But looking beyond the name of the president to the important stuff did you find something wrong in the description of the process of what happens after legislation is voted through? That was the intention of the post - in response to someone asking if they needed to submit before the vote.
There’s already a site-wide policy against posting AI-generated content unless it’s explicitly marked according to the instructions. I never post AI stuff so I don’t keep the instructions ready at hand, but I’m sure that it’s easy enough to find.
The burden of proof is on the poster of AI-generated content.
The worst part for me is it’s 100 lines of slop to scroll through. If you have to query an AI, please tell it to summarize the result in 3-4 sentences and then verify those sentences are true before posting!
